Research Report: Loneliness

The following is an AI generated Deep Research report on the topic of loneliness. I generated this report to attempt to gather information on scientific studies and meta-analyses on topics of loneliness to use in a talk that I prepared to give to my Church congregation. The prompt was the following:

I’m in the process of writing a talk / essay on the topic of loneliness, and what we can do on a personal and local level to help alleviate those that might be feeling lonely this Christmas season. In preparing this essay, I’d like to reference any peer-reviewed, true social and/or scientific studies that have shown the effects of loneliness on human physiology, psychology, or other aspects of the human experience. Please research peer-reviewed studies and their results, especially those that drew meaningful, statistically significant conclusions. Also, please include science-backed findings on what one could do to help alleviate loneliness in others, or in themselves. Present the findings in a simple, easy-to-digest manner, not overly scientific, as I am not a trained scientist. I don’t necessarily want you to draw your own conclusions on what to do next, I’m just looking for information that has been determined from real, peer-reviewed and published studies, including observed effects, and potential solutions.

Executive Summary

This report presents an exhaustive examination of the phenomenon of loneliness, framed not merely as an emotional state but as a biological warning signal critical to human survival. Prepared to inform a public address and essay on alleviating loneliness during the Christmas season, this document synthesizes findings from decades of peer-reviewed literature, including meta-analyses on mortality, neurobiological studies on cognitive decline, and sociological investigations into social contagion.

The analysis reveals that loneliness functions as a potent physiological stressor, comparable in lethality to smoking and obesity. It dysregulates the neuroendocrine system, increases vascular resistance, alters gene expression, and accelerates cognitive decline. However, the literature also offers robust, science-backed interventions. These range from internal cognitive reframing and mindfulness practices to external behavioral changes such as “social snacking,” cultivating “weak ties,” and engaging in community-level “third places.”

Crucially, this report addresses the specific context of the holiday season, debunking prevalent myths regarding suicide rates while acknowledging the genuine psychological pressure exerted by societal expectations of festive connection. The findings presented herein are accessible yet scientifically rigorous, providing a foundation for actionable advice on alleviating loneliness on both personal and local levels.

Part I: The Anatomy of Loneliness

Defining the Condition

To address loneliness effectively, one must first distinguish it from the physical state of being alone. The scientific consensus defines loneliness as a subjective distress resulting from a discrepancy between an individual’s desired and actual social relationships.1 It is the perception of isolation, rather than the objective number of contacts, that drives the physiological maladaptations discussed in this report. An individual can be solitary without being lonely, just as one can be profoundly lonely in a crowded room or a marriage.1

Evolutionary psychologists and neuroscientists, such as the late John Cacioppo, have posited that loneliness is not a personality defect or a sign of weakness. Instead, it is a survival impulse analogous to hunger, thirst, or physical pain.4 Just as hunger motivates an organism to seek food to prevent starvation, loneliness triggers a drive to seek social connection to prevent the dangers of isolation. In our evolutionary history, separation from the tribe meant a loss of protection and resources, effectively serving as a death sentence. Therefore, the human body evolved to enter a state of hyper-vigilance—a “fight or flight” readiness—when perceived social connections are severed.4 This evolutionary lens explains why the physiological response to loneliness is so severe: the body is reacting to a perceived life threat.

Solitude vs. Loneliness: The Role of Agency

A critical distinction exists between loneliness and solitude. While loneliness is marked by distress and a sense of deficiency, solitude is a state of being alone without feeling lonely. Research indicates that solitude can be restorative, fostering self-awareness, creativity, and emotional regulation.6

Recent studies tracking adults in the UK and US found that time spent alone was linked to reduced stress and a sense of freedom, provided the solitude was chosen rather than enforced.8 The emotional impact of being alone is heavily moderated by one’s mindset and the degree of autonomy one feels. When individuals are able to reframe solitude as a beneficial experience for self-reflection or rest—a concept often referred to as “positive solitude”—they experience increased positive affect.8 Conversely, when being alone is perceived as social failure, abandonment, or lack of control—the definition of loneliness—the biological consequences are severe.9

The Prevalence of the “Lonely Society”

The modern prevalence of loneliness has led public health officials to label it an epidemic. The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on Social Connection highlights that lacking social connection is as dangerous as smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day.11 Estimates suggest that approximately 20% of Americans—roughly 60 million people—suffer from loneliness chronic and severe enough to be a major source of unhappiness.4

This is not merely a problem of the elderly, though they are a high-risk group; widespread data indicates that social deficits are predictive of death even in samples with an average age younger than 65 years.3 The pervasive nature of this condition suggests that it is not an edge case for a few isolated individuals but a structural public health crisis that requires the same level of attention as obesity or substance abuse.

Part II: The Physiology of Disconnection

The most profound insight from the last forty years of research is that loneliness does not stay in the brain; it permeates the body. It alters gene expression, hardens arteries, and suppresses immune function. The body of a lonely person is physiologically distinct from the body of a connected person.

Mortality and Loneliness: The Meta-Analytic Evidence

The link between social connection and longevity is one of the most robust findings in social epidemiology. A landmark meta-analysis conducted by Julianne Holt-Lunstad and colleagues, which reviewed 148 studies involving over 300,000 participants, concluded that individuals with stronger social relationships have a 50% increased likelihood of survival compared to those with weaker social relationships.12

This effect size is comparable to quitting smoking and exceeds many well-known risk factors for mortality, such as obesity and physical inactivity.12 Later research confirmed that both objective isolation (living alone) and subjective isolation (feeling lonely) are independent predictors of premature death.3 The consistency of these findings across gender, length of follow-up, and world region underscores the universality of social connection as a biological imperative.3

Table 1: Comparative Mortality Risks of Social Isolation vs. Other Factors

Source: Data synthesized from Holt-Lunstad et al. 11

Cardiovascular Impact: The “Vascular Resistance” of Isolation

The heart bears a significant burden when a person is lonely. Research led by John Cacioppo demonstrated that lonely individuals exhibit increased total peripheral resistance (TPR)—a measure of the resistance to blood flow within the circulatory system.14 This occurs not only during stressful events but also at baseline, while sitting quietly.

The mechanism is believed to be evolutionary. Because the lonely brain perceives the environment as unsafe (lacking the “safety in numbers”), it keeps the sympathetic nervous system (the “fight or flight” system) on high alert. This chronic vigilance constricts blood vessels to prepare the body for potential physical threat or injury, driving up blood pressure over time.14 In one study utilizing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, researchers found that as loneliness increased, so did vascular resistance during the course of a normal day.14

Longitudinal studies have confirmed these physiological snapshots. Loneliness in middle age is associated with age-related increases in blood pressure that are steeper than those seen in socially connected peers.14 Furthermore, a systematic review found that loneliness and social isolation are associated with a 29% increased risk of coronary heart disease and a 32% increased risk of stroke.16 The lonely heart is literally working harder to push blood through a constricted system, leading to wear and tear that manifests as cardiovascular events later in life.17

The HPA Axis and Cortisol Dysregulation

The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis, which regulates the body’s stress response, functions differently in lonely individuals. Cortisol, the primary stress hormone, typically peaks in the morning (the “cortisol awakening response”) to provide energy for the day and tapers off by evening.

However, studies show that lonely individuals exhibit a larger “morning rise” in cortisol and higher circulating levels throughout the day.14 This chronic elevation of cortisol has a corrosive effect. While acute cortisol release is anti-inflammatory, chronic exposure leads to “glucocorticoid resistance.” Essentially, the immune cells stop listening to the cortisol signal, allowing inflammation to run rampant.16

This provides the biological pathway explaining why lonely people are more susceptible to inflammatory diseases. The cellular genome of a lonely person actually shows a different transcription profile: genes involved in the inflammatory response are upregulated, while genes involved in antiviral responses are downregulated.16 The lonely body prepares for bacterial infection (from physical wounds associated with predator attacks—a primal fear of being alone) rather than viral protection—another evolutionary hangover that is maladaptive in the modern world. This phenomenon is known as the “Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity” (CTRA).16

Sleep Fragmentation

Loneliness also steals sleep. While lonely individuals do not necessarily spend less time in bed, the quality of their sleep is significantly degraded. Research using ambulatory devices has shown that lonely individuals experience more “micro-awakenings” throughout the night.15

This sleep fragmentation is likely another manifestation of hyper-vigilance. The brain, perceiving a lack of a “safe tribe” to keep watch, remains in a state of low-level alertness to detect threats, preventing the restorative deep sleep necessary for physical and cognitive repair.15 Over time, this lack of restorative sleep contributes to the metabolic and cardiovascular deterioration observed in lonely populations.

Part III: The Neurology of Loneliness and Cognitive Decline

The impact of loneliness extends to the structural integrity of the brain and cognitive function, particularly in later life. The brain, much like the heart, relies on social stimulation to maintain its resilience.

Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease Risk

Recent large-scale analyses have cemented loneliness as a critical risk factor for dementia. A comprehensive study analyzing data from over 600,000 participants across 21 longitudinal cohorts found that loneliness increases the risk of all-cause dementia by 31%.1 Specifically, loneliness increased the risk for Alzheimer’s disease by 14% and vascular dementia by 17%.1

This association holds true even when controlling for depression, social isolation (living alone), and demographic factors, suggesting that the subjective feeling of loneliness itself—and the stress it generates—is the culprit. The mechanism likely involves the aforementioned inflammatory pathways and cortisol dysregulation, which are known to be neurotoxic to the hippocampus, the brain region responsible for memory formation and consolidation.2 Chronic inflammation in the brain (neuroinflammation) is a hallmark of Alzheimer’s pathology.

Table 2: Loneliness and Dementia Risk

Source: Synthesis of large-scale analysis funded by NIA.1

Genetic Interactions (APOE4)

The interaction between loneliness and genetics provides further insight into vulnerability. The APOE4 allele is a well-known genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s. However, research suggests that the risk of dementia is significantly amplified when a carrier of this gene is also lonely.

More strikingly, in those without the genetic predisposition (non-carriers), loneliness alone can elevate the risk of dementia to levels comparable to carriers, specifically in populations under age 80.20 This finding is profound: it suggests that a toxic social environment (loneliness) can be as potent a determinant of cognitive health as a high-risk genetic heritage. It underscores the potential for social interventions to delay or prevent cognitive decline even in those without genetic risks.

Cognitive Bias and Maladaptive Cognition

Loneliness reshapes how the brain processes social information. Lonely individuals tend to develop “maladaptive social cognition,” a state of hyper-vigilance to social threats.5 They are more likely to interpret ambiguous social signals as rejection or hostility.

For example, a lonely person might interpret a friend’s delayed text message as a deliberate slight rather than a sign the friend is busy. This “confirmatory bias” creates a vicious cycle: the lonely person withdraws to protect themselves from perceived rejection, thereby increasing their isolation and confirming their belief that the world is unfriendly.5 This cognitive distortion is a primary target for the interventions discussed later in this report, as it serves as a barrier to re-entry into social networks.

Part IV: The Holiday Paradox

Addressing loneliness during the Christmas season requires navigating a landscape of cultural myths and psychological realities. The season presents a unique set of stressors that can exacerbate the experience of isolation.

The “Holiday Blues” and Suicide Statistics

A pervasive urban legend suggests that suicide rates spike during the winter holidays. Research categorically disproves this. Data from the CDC and international studies consistently show that December typically has the lowest or second-lowest suicide rates of any month.22 Suicide rates actually peak in the late spring and summer months.22

It is crucial to correct this misconception in any public address, as perpetuating the myth can inadvertently normalize the idea of holiday suicide for vulnerable individuals.24 The “Holiday Blues” are real, but they typically manifest as low-grade sadness, stress, or nostalgia rather than acute suicidal crisis for the majority of the population. The persistence of this myth may be due to the “availability heuristic”—suicides that do occur during the holidays are more memorable because they contrast so sharply with the festive backdrop.

The Contrast Effect and the “Outsider” Experience

While suicide rates may be low, the sensation of loneliness can be acutely heightened during the holidays due to the “contrast effect.” The season is culturally saturated with imagery of hyper-connectedness—happy families, romantic reunions, and communal feasting.10

For those who lack these connections, the contrast between the societal ideal and their personal reality is stark. A recent survey indicated that 61% of Americans experience sadness or loneliness during the holidays, and 37% would skip the season entirely if given the choice.10 The pressure to be happy can function as a psychological weight; when an individual feels they “should” be joyful and connected but are not, the discrepancy creates distress.

Furthermore, the holidays can exacerbate feelings of being an “outsider.” Psychology Professor Eric Landrum notes that loneliness feels most isolating when it is perceived as being out of one’s control—a feeling of being excluded from the “in-group” of festive celebrants.10 The visuals of the season—lit houses, crowded shops, parties—can serve as constant reminders of the connections one lacks.

Impact of Disrupted Routine

Another factor contributing to holiday loneliness is the disruption of routine. Workplaces, schools, and regular community centers often close or reduce hours. For many, these “secondary” social environments provide the bulk of their daily social contact. When these structures pause, the silence can be deafening, removing the “weak tie” interactions (discussed in Part VII) that normally sustain an individual’s sense of belonging.25

Part V: The Contagion of Disconnection

Loneliness is not a static individual trait; it is a dynamic force that flows through social networks. Understanding this contagion is vital for understanding why community-level interventions are necessary.

The Spread of Isolation

Groundbreaking research from the Framingham Heart Study, analyzed by Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler, revealed that loneliness spreads through social networks like a contagion.26 They found that if a direct friend becomes lonely, an individual’s likelihood of becoming lonely increases by 52%. This influence extends up to three degrees of separation: a friend of a friend of a friend becoming lonely can still exert a statistical influence on an individual’s social well-being.27

This means that loneliness is not just an individual burden but a network property. A pocket of loneliness in a community can destabilize the social health of the entire group.

The Mechanism of Fraying

The contagion does not operate by mere proximity. Rather, it operates through behavioral withdrawal. When a person becomes lonely, they tend to be more irritable, defensive, and socially awkward (due to the maladaptive social cognition described earlier). This behavior often leads them to withdraw from their social circle or to be pushed to the periphery.26

As they withdraw, they sever ties. This leaves their remaining friends with one less connection, weakening those friends’ networks and making them more susceptible to loneliness. Christakis describes this as the “social fabric fraying at the edges”.26 The lonely person moves to the edge of the network, and the instability propagates inward.

Gender Differences in Contagion

Interestingly, this contagion effect appears stronger among women. The Framingham analysis found that loneliness spreads much more easily among women than men.27 This may be because women are often the primary maintainers of emotional social ties and are more attentive to the emotional states of their network, making them more “permeable” to the emotional withdrawal of a friend. This finding suggests that women may be both the primary victims and the primary vectors of social isolation within a community, but also potentially the most effective agents for reversing it.

Part VI: Personal Interventions – The Science of Self-Correction

Given the physiological and neurological weight of loneliness, what can an individual do? The literature suggests that the most effective interventions are not necessarily about “meeting more people” immediately, but about changing how one thinks about meeting people and how one engages with oneself.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Reframing

A major meta-analysis by Masi et al. compared various interventions for loneliness (improving social skills, increasing social support, increasing opportunities for interaction, and addressing maladaptive social cognition). The analysis found that addressing maladaptive social cognition was by far the most effective intervention.21

This confirms that loneliness is often a perception problem as much as a quantity problem. CBT techniques help individuals identify and challenge their negative automatic thoughts.

Practical Application: Cognitive Restructuring

• The Trigger: A negative social event (e.g., not receiving a holiday card from a friend).
• The Automatic Thought: “They must be angry with me,” or “I am not important to them.”
• The Physiology: This thought triggers the threat response (cortisol spike).
• The Intervention: The individual is trained to treat this thought as a hypothesis rather than a fact. They ask: “Is there evidence for this?” or “Is there an alternative explanation?”
• The Reframe: “They might be overwhelmed with the holidays,” or “Postal service is slow this year.”
• The Result: This reduces the fear of rejection, lowering the physiological stress response and preventing the withdrawal behavior that creates actual isolation.31

Mindfulness and Acceptance

While CBT changes the content of thoughts, mindfulness changes the relationship to them. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) significantly reduces feelings of loneliness and pro-inflammatory gene expression.34

In a study by Creswell et al., older adults who underwent an 8-week MBSR program showed reduced loneliness and decreased levels of C-reactive protein (an inflammation marker) compared to a control group.36 Another study found that a 2-week smartphone-based mindfulness training focusing on “Monitor + Accept” (noticing feelings without judgment) reduced daily loneliness by 22%.37

Mechanism: Mindfulness reduces the “resistance” to the feeling of loneliness. By accepting the feeling without spiraling into self-judgment (“I am lonely because I am unlovable”), the physiological arousal (cortisol spike) is dampened, preventing the chronic stress cycle.

Limiting Social Media Use

In the digital age, virtual connection often displaces physical connection and fuels social comparison. An experimental study by Hunt et al. (University of Pennsylvania) found a causal link between social media use and loneliness. Participants who limited their use of Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat to 10 minutes per platform per day (30 minutes total) showed significant reductions in loneliness and depression over three weeks.38

Key Insight: The reduction in “Fear of Missing Out” (FOMO) and social comparison suggests that social media often acts as a catalyst for the “contrast effect” discussed in the holiday section. Limiting use forces individuals to engage with their immediate, tangible reality, which is often less isolating than the curated perfection of online feeds.

Part VII: Behavioral Interventions – The Power of “Weak Ties” and Kindness

Beyond internal psychological work, specific behaviors have been scientifically proven to generate connection. These behaviors often focus on “giving” rather than “receiving” connection.

The Strength of Weak Ties

Sociologist Mark Granovetter revolutionized the understanding of social networks with his theory of the “strength of weak ties.” While strong ties (close family/friends) provide emotional depth, weak ties (acquaintances, the barista, the mail carrier) provide access to new information and a sense of community integration.40

Recent research supports the idea that weak ties are vital for combating loneliness. A study tracking interactions found that engaging with weak ties was associated with greater physical activity and positive mood.42 These low-stakes interactions provide a sense of belonging without the emotional demands of deep relationships.

Application: “Social Snacking”
Psychologists have coined the term “Social Snacking” to describe brief, positive interactions with strangers or acquaintances.43 Just as a snack provides temporary sustenance, these interactions (a smile, a brief chat in line, a wave) release oxytocin and provide a “buffer” against the pain of isolation.43

• Evidence: Studies show that acknowledging strangers (e.g., nodding or smiling) increases feelings of connection and belonging for both parties. In a holiday context, this might mean deliberately greeting service workers or neighbors.45

The “Helper’s High”: Volunteering and Kindness

Altruism is a potent antidote to isolation. Volunteering moves the focus from the self (and one’s own lack of connection) to the needs of others.

Scientific Findings:

• Threshold for Benefit: A longitudinal study found that volunteering more than 100 hours per year (roughly 2 hours a week) is the “sweet spot” for reducing mortality and loneliness.46 Those who volunteered less than this amount did not see the same protective benefits.
• Mechanism: Volunteering triggers the mesolimbic reward system, releasing dopamine and oxytocin—the “helper’s high”.48
• Random Acts of Kindness: A study on happy people found that simply counting one’s own acts of kindness for one week increased subjective happiness.50 Kindness is also contagious; observing a generous act increases the likelihood that the observer will behave generously, creating a ripple effect of connection.28 This suggests that a lonely person can “infect” their network with kindness, reversing the contagion of loneliness.

Part VIII: Community and Environmental Solutions

Finally, alleviating loneliness is not solely an individual responsibility; it is a structural one. We must build environments that facilitate interaction.

The Concept of “Third Places”

Ray Oldenburg introduced the concept of “Third Places”—locations that are neither home (first place) nor work (second place), where people gather and interact. These include coffee shops, libraries, parks, and barber shops.52

Research indicates that the availability of third places is inversely correlated with loneliness. A study of caregiving spouses found that those living in neighborhoods with a higher density of third places reported lower levels of loneliness.54 These spaces provide the physical infrastructure for the “weak tie” interactions discussed above.

The Holiday Application: During the holidays, when schools and workplaces may be closed, third places become critical refuges for social contact. Libraries and community centers that remain open offer a vital lifeline. Supporting these spaces is a local intervention for loneliness.

Micro-Urbanist Interventions

Small-scale community interventions have shown surprising efficacy in building neighborhood cohesion.

1. The Turquoise Table
Started by Kristin Schell, this movement involves placing a turquoise picnic table in one’s front yard (rather than the private back yard) to invite interaction.

• Impact: While primarily anecdotal, the movement demonstrates the power of visible hospitality. It lowers the barrier to entry for social interaction; neighbors do not need an invitation to walk by, but the table signals permission to stop and chat.55 It leverages the “weak tie” mechanism by creating a physical anchor for serendipitous interaction.

2. Little Free Libraries
These small book-exchange boxes act as “social magnets.”

• Evidence: They serve as “unbiased proxies” for interaction. People stop to look at books, which creates a natural, low-pressure conversation starter for neighbors who might otherwise never speak.57 They beautify the space and signal a trusting, giving community, which enhances the “sense of community” (SOC) scores in neighborhood surveys.58

3. Communal Eating
Eating together is a primal bonding mechanism. Research from the University of Oxford and “The Big Lunch” project found that people who eat socially feel happier and are more satisfied with life.60

• Findings: Sharing a meal increases social bonding and feelings of embeddedness within the community. The frequency of social eating is a predictor of the size of one’s social network.61
• Application: “Friendsmas” or “Orphan Christmas” gatherings leverage this effect, creating fictive kinships that provide the same psychological protection as biological families.63

Part IX: Synthesis and Actionable Conclusions

The research presented in this report leads to a clear set of conclusions regarding the nature of loneliness and the path toward alleviation.

1. Reframe the Narrative

Loneliness is a biological signal, not a pathology. Recognizing it as a cue to seek connection—much like hunger is a cue to seek food—can reduce the shame associated with it. This is particularly vital during the holidays, where the “Holiday Blues” myth should be countered with accurate information about the universality of seasonal stress.

2. Prioritize “Maladaptive Cognition” Correction

Before seeking new friends, individuals must address their internal bias. The most scientifically validated intervention is cognitive reframing.21 For a holiday talk, this translates to encouraging the audience to catch their negative assumptions (“No one called me because they don’t care”) and test them against reality.

3. Embrace the “Weak Tie”

Deep friendship takes time, but connection can be instant. The science supports the validity of “social snacking.” A chat with a cashier or a wave to a neighbor is not a triviality; it is a physiological buffer that lowers vascular resistance and improves mood.40

4. Structure the Environment

On a local level, the creation of “Third Places” and the use of micro-interventions like Little Free Libraries or “Turquoise Tables” effectively engineer serendipity. They remove the friction of social initiation.

5. The Active Ingredient is Giving

The strongest antidote to the helplessness of loneliness is agency. Volunteering (specifically hitting that ~2 hours/week threshold) and performing acts of kindness flip the script from “waiting to be included” to “doing the including.” This reverses the withdrawal behavior that spreads loneliness, effectively turning the individual from a point of contagion for isolation into a point of contagion for connection.28

Final Thought

The science is unequivocal: we are hardwired for connection. While the modern world—and the holiday season specifically—can create profound gaps between our social needs and our social reality, the bridges across those gaps are built on small, scientifically valid actions. From a ten-minute meditation to a ten-second interaction with a stranger, the remedy for loneliness is often closer, and simpler, than we believe.

Appendix: Summary of Key Interventions

Works cited

1. Loneliness linked to dementia risk in large-scale analysis - Alzheimers.gov, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.alzheimers.gov/news/loneliness-linked-dementia-risk-large-scale-analysis
2. The Impact of Loneliness and Social Isolation on Cognitive Aging: A Narrative Review - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10357115/
3. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review - PubMed, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25910392/
4. The nature of loneliness - The University of Chicago Magazine, accessed December 8, 2025, https://magazine.uchicago.edu/1012/features/the-nature-of-loneliness.shtml
5. Loneliness is contagious, study suggests - Science News, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/loneliness-contagious-study-suggests
6. accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.zingtrain.com/blog/the-power-of-solitude/#:~:text=Solitude%2C%20to%20be%20clear%2C%20is%20not%20a%20synonym%20for%20loneliness.&text=Solitude%2C%20on%20the%20other%20hand,without%20regular%20rounds%20of%20it.
7. Being alone has its benefits − a psychologist flips the script on the ‘loneliness epidemic’ : r/psychology - Reddit, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/psychology/comments/1jrc38u/being_alone_has_its_benefits_a_psychologist_flips/
8. Alone but not lonely: how solitude boosts wellbeing - University of Reading, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.reading.ac.uk/news/2023/Research-News/How-solitude-boosts-wellbeing
9. Solitude can be good-If you see it as such: Reappraisal helps lonely people experience solitude more positively - PubMed, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37724779/
10. Holidays are supposed to be merry and bright, but for some, they amplify feelings of isolation, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.boisestate.edu/news/2024/11/25/holidays-are-supposed-to-be-merry-but-they-can-amplify-feelings-of-isolation/
11. Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation - HHS.gov, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf
12. Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2910600/
13. Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review | PLOS Medicine, accessed December 8, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
14. John Cacioppo on Loneliness and the Body | Big Think - YouTube, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j99i-_ajsJE
15. Loneliness and health: potential mechanisms - PubMed - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12021415/
16. Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cardiovascular Health - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5831910/
17. A Systematic Review of the Impact and Outcome of Loneliness and Self-Isolation on Individuals Living With Cardiovascular Disease - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12032856/
18. Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3874845/
19. (PDF) Loneliness and Health: Potential Mechanisms - ResearchGate, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11351278_Loneliness_and_Health_Potential_Mechanisms
20. Contributions of loneliness to cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults are independent of other risk factors and Alzheimer’s pathology: a narrative review - Frontiers, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1380002/full
21. A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Loneliness - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3865701/
22. Fact or Fiction: Suicides Increase During the Holiday Season and Winter Months | Blogs, accessed December 8, 2025, https://blogs.cdc.gov/nchs/2014/01/10/1121/
23. Association of holidays and the day of the week with suicide risk: multicountry, two stage, time series study | The BMJ, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.bmj.com/content/387/bmj-2024-077262
24. Suicide Rate Is Low During the Holidays, but the Holiday-Suicide Myth Persists | Annenberg, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.asc.upenn.edu/news-events/news/suicide-rate-low-during-holidays-holiday-suicide-myth-persists
25. Coping with loneliness during the festive season - Mental Health Foundation, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/explore-mental-health/blogs/coping-loneliness-during-festive-season
26. Loneliness can be contagious, study finds | University of Chicago News, accessed December 8, 2025, https://news.uchicago.edu/story/loneliness-can-be-contagious-study-finds
27. Alone in the Crowd: The Structure and Spread of Loneliness in a Large Social Network - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2792572/
28. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks - PNAS, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0913149107
29. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness - PubMed - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20716644/
30. Interventions for loneliness in older adults: a systematic review of reviews - Frontiers, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1427605/full
31. Feeling Lonely? How CBT Can Help - The North Jersey Center for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, accessed December 8, 2025, https://njccbt.com/blog/how-can-cbt-help-with-loneliness
32. Confronting Loneliness With Tools From Psychological Science, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mental-health-in-the-internet-age/202309/confronting-loneliness-with-tools-from-psychological
33. TWENTY QUESTIONS TO HELP YOU CHALLENGE NEGATIVE THOUGHTS, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.mcgill.ca/counselling/files/counselling/20_questions_to_challenge_negative_thoughts_0.pdf
34. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and loneliness in older adults: two randomized controlled trials | The Journals of Gerontology: Series B | Oxford Academic, accessed December 8, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/80/12/gbaf178/8262485
35. Mindfulness-based stress reduction increases stimulated IL-6 production among lonely older adults: A randomized controlled trial - PubMed, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35550854/
36. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Training Reduces Loneliness and Pro-Inflammatory Gene Expression in Older Adults: A Small Randomized Controlled Trial - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3635809/
37. Mindfulness training reduces loneliness and increases social contact in a randomized controlled trial | PNAS, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1813588116
38. No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression | Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology - Guilford Journals, accessed December 8, 2025, https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/jscp.2018.37.10.751
39. Social media use increases depression and loneliness - Penn Today, accessed December 8, 2025, https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/social-media-use-increases-depression-and-loneliness
40. The real strength of weak ties | Stanford Report, accessed December 8, 2025, https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2022/09/real-strength-weak-ties
41. The strength of weak ties | Stanford Report, accessed December 8, 2025, https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2023/07/strength-weak-ties
42. The Strength of Weaker Ties: An Underexplored Resource for Maintaining Emotional Well-Being in Later Life - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7424273/
43. Social Snacking Toolkit - Connections First, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.connectionsfirst.ca/social-snacking
44. Social Snacking: A simple way to feed your craving for connection, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.heatheryoungcounselling.com/post/have-you-had-your-social-snack-today
45. Social snacking to increase NDIS psychosocial participant’s belonging in community, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.mind-life.org.au/post/social-snacking-to-increase-ndis-psychosocial-participant-s-belonging-in-community
46. The Relationship Between Volunteering and the Occurrence of Loneliness Among Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study with 12 Years of Follow-Up, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01634372.2022.2139322
47. Volunteering and Subsequent Health and Well-being in Older Adults: An Outcome-wide Longitudinal Approach - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7375895/
48. Helping people, changing lives: 3 health benefits of volunteering, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/3-health-benefits-of-volunteering
49. The Mental Health Benefits of Giving and Volunteering During the Holiday Season, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.mind24-7.com/blog/the-mental-health-benefits-of-giving-and-volunteering-during-the-holiday-season/
50. HAPPY PEOPLE BECOME HAPPIER THROUGH KINDNESS: A COUNTING KINDNESSES INTERVENTION - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1820947/
51. The Social Contagion of Generosity - PMC - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3923723/
52. Fighting loneliness with parks and third places | CNU - Congress for the New Urbanism, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.cnu.org/publicsquare/2025/01/14/fighting-loneliness-parks-and-third-places
53. Closure of ‘Third Places’? Exploring Potential Consequences for Collective Health and Wellbeing - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6934089/
54. THE ROLE OF THIRD PLACES IN REDUCING LONELINESS AMONG CAREGIVING SPOUSES | Innovation in Aging | Oxford Academic, accessed December 8, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/innovateage/article/6/Supplement_1/559/6939039
55. The Turquoise Table Movement - Homestead, accessed December 8, 2025, https://livehomesteadtx.com/blog-the-turquoise-table/
56. Goal of Turquoise Tables Is To Create Gathering Spot for Neighbors | MU Extension, accessed December 8, 2025, https://extension.missouri.edu/news/goal-of-turquoise-tables-is-to-create-gathering-spot-for-neighbors
57. The Big Opportunities of Little Free Libraries:, accessed December 8, 2025, https://journals.library.wustl.edu/pollib/article/8557/galley/25384/view/
58. Little Free Libraries Have a Unique Neighborhood Goal, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.hopefulneighborhood.org/blog/little-free-libraries-have-a-unique-neighborhood-goal/
59. Spatial Politics and Literacy: An Analysis of Little Free Libraries and Neighborhood Distribution of Book-Sharing Depositories i - PDXScholar, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=eng_bookpubpaper
60. Social eating connects communities | University of Oxford, accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2017-03-16-social-eating-connects-communities
61. accessed December 8, 2025, https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2017-03-16-social-eating-connects-communities#:~:text=The%20results%20suggest%20that%20communal,and%20embedding%20within%20the%20community.
62. Breaking Bread: the Functions of Social Eating - PMC - NIH, accessed December 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6979515/
63. The sociology of ‘Friendsmas’ and the value of traditions – Social Sciences Birmingham, accessed December 8, 2025, https://blog.bham.ac.uk/socialsciencesbirmingham/2024/12/16/the-sociology-of-friendsmas-and-the-value-of-traditions/

Other Related Topics

• Research Reports
• Family
• Friendship

References

• Loneliness